From The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Jump to: navigation, search
The Times coverage of series 1 date
Elevate, exterminate: Daleks conquer stairs in new Doctor Who 2005-03-06
For 25 years, Doctor Who's creaky charm captivated a nation 2005-03-06
The thrill of the chaise 2005-03-06
The Doctor faces his newest adversary ... the Canadians 2005-03-09
Doctor Who puts accent on a new look to old show 2005-03-10
Forgotten timelord 2005-03-11
The Return of the Time Lord 2005-03-18
Billie the kid 2005-03-19
Piper at the gates of dim 2005-03-21
The Whys and Whats of Who 2005-03-26
Doctor faces a high-tech challenge 2005-03-26
Blonde Bombshell 2005-03-26
Oh Lord, he's still stuck in the past 2005-03-27
Just what the Doctor ordered 2005-03-28
Who's the daddy as 10m find time to see the Doctor 2005-03-28
The Right Medicine? 2005-03-30
He saves the world and BBC, then Dr Who quits 2005-03-31
Casanova actor seduces the Doctor Who casting agent 2005-04-01
Dr Who too scary for young children 2005-04-14
BBC climbs down over Doctor Who fear factor 2005-04-15
Casanova regenerates into the new Doctor Who 2005-04-16
Who's Afraid? 2005-04-19
Nigel Andrew's View 2005-04-23
Rovers' returns 2005-04-29
Back behind the sofa — it's a Dalek 2005-05-02
Wanted: One Time Lord, Tardis optional 2005-05-06
An absurd ruling takes the fun out of Doctor Who 2005-05-16
Let's not be beastly to Daleks 2005-05-16
Unsuitable for children 2005-05-17
The censors ... will ... exterminate 2005-05-17
Doctor treated 2005-05-19
Legislate! Legislate! 2005-05-19
BBC advises Doctor Who fans to stay offline until the bitter end 2005-06-14
Sought, located 2005-06-15
The Doctor's fate is sealed with a first kiss — or two 2005-06-16
I'm prepared for my role as BBC Man, but how to fit Big Specs into the new Dr Who? 2005-06-25

Legislate! Legislate! (2005)

2005-05-19 Times p68.jpg

[edit]

Should children see an episode of Doctor Who in which a Dalek is tortured?

debate@thetimes.co.uk

Debate the issues of the day

I WAS horrified to read what this episode contained (The Times, May 16). It is time that opinion formers, such as The Times, realise that we cannot allow more and more violence to appear on our screens — from which most children form their view of the world. How long will it be before some child steals a drill from the workshop to frighten another child and maybe goes as far as the Dalek's tormentors?

Connie Francis, Reading, Hertfordshire


True torture

I CANNOT understand why the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) should refuse an episode a PG certificate because it shows a Dalek being tortured. Over the past 40 years worse things have been shown on the BBC The BBFC censors should get on with more important things, such as warning us off Footballers' Wives.

Russell Buer, Exmouth, Devon


Morality tale

THE Dalek episode may well be unsuitable for those under 12 because of its distressing content, but I do not necessarily agree with the BBFC that it encourages violence as the only solution. My 12-year-old son was heartbroken at the plight of the Dalek and cried buckets. It was not the Doctor's abuse that impressed him but the Doctor's sudden realisation that in doing so he was becoming the thing that he hated, and his decision to act compassionately and rescue Rose, even at the risk of letting the Dalek out In the end it encouraged his compassion towards the "alien and different" and was more likely to influence him towards kindness than otherwise.

We saw the first, episode of The Lord of the Rings when he was 8. He was quite happy about the fights and monsters but hid under my arm when the camera angle swooped down from the sky because he was scared of heights. The rating system is useful, but there is no substitute for watching with your child or previewing for yourself.

Valerie Higgins, v41.3r13jh@hotmail.com


Censor confusion

IT APPEARS that in this universe that no resource is unlimited; except for some types of human stupidity. The BBFC ruling concerning censorship of the new Doctor Who series is disturbing in its implication that being beastly to a Dalek is more damaging to a child than watching a violent soap opera, made to mirror society as plausibly as possible. It also implies that children and their parents haven't the wit to dissect fact from science fiction.

Jack Andrews, Westerham, Kent


Too trusting

THE Dalek episode showed a rare desire to hurt and kill, in a man usually passive enough to face the horrors of time and space armed only with sarcasm and a screwdriver. Apparently the censors have decided that for a character to have such a flaw makes him a bad role model. Yet it is a good thing for children to see that their role models also have failings. If more people learnt not to unconditionally trust authority figures, the Hitlers and Mugabes of this world would find it far more difficult to achieve and retain power.

The BBFC is morally out of touch, irrelevant and universally ignored. It is past time for this relic of the 1950s to be exterminated.

Samuel Blanning, Bath


First blood

IF A child is banned from seeing a bit of Dalek abuse, then goodness knows how he or she is meant to deal with Roald Dahl or the Brothers Grimm, or, as a young teenager studying Shakespeare, with the blinding of Gloucester — never mind the blood-soaked Classics. In feeling "righteous" anger, the Doctor demonstrated how the inexcusable desire to hurt is so often expedited and how we have no right to judge anything — even the pure barbarism of the Daleks. My 10-year-old son managed to work this out, but then I hope he'll aim higher than a job at the BBFC

Joseph Wall, Salford


Protect the few

MY CHILDREN are adopted — they were severely traumatised as infants and as a result their emotions are exceptionally fragile and can be triggered by the slightest provocation. Programmes aimed at children need to protect the traumatised ones, even if they are a minority. It therefore makes perfect sense to alert parents to the content of programmes such as this particular episode of Doctor Who. I do not let my children watch violent programmes, such as EastEnders, but it is more difficult to police this when they are at other people's houses. More nanny knows best, please.

Name and address withheld


What's your view?

To contribute to debates on this page, please e-mail not more than 150 words to debate@thetimes.co.uk or fax 020-7782 5870. Please Include your address and daytime telephone number.

Other topics for discussion

Do we treat our elderly as we should? debate@thetimes.co.uk

Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org

  • APA 6th ed.: (2005-05-19). Legislate! Legislate!. The Times p. 68.
  • MLA 7th ed.: "Legislate! Legislate!." The Times [add city] 2005-05-19, 68. Print.
  • Chicago 15th ed.: "Legislate! Legislate!." The Times, edition, sec., 2005-05-19
  • Turabian: "Legislate! Legislate!." The Times, 2005-05-19, section, 68 edition.
  • Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=Legislate! Legislate! | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Legislate!_Legislate! | work=The Times | pages=68 | date=2005-05-19 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=26 May 2017 }}</ref>
  • Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=Legislate! Legislate! | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Legislate!_Legislate! | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=26 May 2017}}</ref>