Doctor Who Cuttings Archive

Review of reviews

From The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Revision as of 03:53, 12 December 2018 by John Lavalie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{article | publication = The Guardian | file = 2017-04-22 Guardian.jpg | px = 450 | height = | width = | date = 2017-04-22 | author = | pages = | language = English | ty...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

2017-04-22 Guardian.jpg

[edit]

Guardian

"The ailing franchise has got its mojo back" ★★★★☆ (article)

Times

"It was smart... it was simple... it was a blast" ★★★★★

Telegraph

"A reminder of how good Doctor Who can be" ★★★★☆


Financial Times

Websites

"Amiable and fun" ign.com ★★★★☆

Twitter

"A very warm welcome back" @MarkGatiss

Average

★★★★☆

Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org

  • APA 6th ed.: (2017-04-22). Review of reviews. The Guardian .
  • MLA 7th ed.: "Review of reviews." The Guardian [add city] 2017-04-22. Print.
  • Chicago 15th ed.: "Review of reviews." The Guardian, edition, sec., 2017-04-22
  • Turabian: "Review of reviews." The Guardian, 2017-04-22, section, edition.
  • Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=Review of reviews | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Review_of_reviews | work=The Guardian | pages= | date=2017-04-22 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=28 March 2024 }}</ref>
  • Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=Review of reviews | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Review_of_reviews | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=28 March 2024}}</ref>