Doctor Who Cuttings Archive

Who's right, Who's wrong on new Who?

From The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Revision as of 00:07, 7 February 2019 by John Lavalie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{article | publication = Daily Express | file = 2017-07-22 Daily Express.jpg | px = 450 | height = | width = | date = 2017-07-22 | author = | pages = 36 | language = Engli...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

2017-07-22 Daily Express.jpg

[edit]

COLIN BAKER and Peter Davison have locked horns over Jodie Whittaker being appointed as the first female Doctor Who.

This week the 35-year-old actress, left, was announced as the 13th Time Lord in the BBC sci-fi drama and what followed was a backlash from many fans and now a bit of to-do among her male predecessors. During an explosive appearance at the Comic-Con in San Diego this week, Peter, 66, centre, the fifth Doctor, faced the wrath of sixth Doctor Colin, 74, below, after he slammed Jodie landing the role. Peter said: "It's the loss of a role model for boys who I think Doctor Who is vitally important for. So I feel a bit sad about that but I understand the argument that you need to open it up. As a viewer I kind of like the idea of the Doctor as a boy but then maybe I'm an old-fashioned dinosaur, who knows?"

Colin, the father of four daughters, hit back stating: "They've had 50 years of having a role model. So sorry Peter, you're talking rubbish there — absolute rubbish. You don't have to be of a gender of someone to be a role model. Can't you be a role model as people?"

He also said he hopes to see a non-white Doctor in the future and that the series should look to America where he feels casting is less dependent on colour. He declared: "They see a future world where that is irrelevant and it's perhaps time Doctor Who and its fans did too."

Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org

  • APA 6th ed.: (2017-07-22). Who's right, Who's wrong on new Who?. Daily Express p. 36.
  • MLA 7th ed.: "Who's right, Who's wrong on new Who?." Daily Express [add city] 2017-07-22, 36. Print.
  • Chicago 15th ed.: "Who's right, Who's wrong on new Who?." Daily Express, edition, sec., 2017-07-22
  • Turabian: "Who's right, Who's wrong on new Who?." Daily Express, 2017-07-22, section, 36 edition.
  • Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=Who's right, Who's wrong on new Who? | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Who%27s_right,_Who%27s_wrong_on_new_Who%3F | work=Daily Express | pages=36 | date=2017-07-22 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=28 March 2024 }}</ref>
  • Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=Who's right, Who's wrong on new Who? | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Who%27s_right,_Who%27s_wrong_on_new_Who%3F | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=28 March 2024}}</ref>