Doctor Who Cuttings Archive

A meddlesome companion

From The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Jump to navigationJump to search

1986-03-09 Tampa Tribune.jpg

[edit]

Dr. Who

When Walt Belcher said that Dr. Who was "strange and is usually accompanied by a meddlesome companion," I couldn't have been more insulted.

The only reason they can't pay commercial stations to play "Dr. Who" is because it is very expensive. Second, they have no taste. I think Belcher gave Dr. Who the short end of the stick again. If someone doesn't appreciate good science fiction, he just shouldn't watch it. There's no sex or violence in it.

As for it being a strange bedfellow, I disagree. Where would you see this kind of experiment? Certainly not on TV.

Donna Y.

Zephyrhills


Belcher's column said Doctor Who "meddled," not his companions. — Editor

Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org

  • APA 6th ed.: (1986-03-09). A meddlesome companion. The Tampa Tribune .
  • MLA 7th ed.: "A meddlesome companion." The Tampa Tribune [add city] 1986-03-09. Print.
  • Chicago 15th ed.: "A meddlesome companion." The Tampa Tribune, edition, sec., 1986-03-09
  • Turabian: "A meddlesome companion." The Tampa Tribune, 1986-03-09, section, edition.
  • Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=A meddlesome companion | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/A_meddlesome_companion | work=The Tampa Tribune | pages= | date=1986-03-09 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=19 October 2019 }}</ref>
  • Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=A meddlesome companion | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/A_meddlesome_companion | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=19 October 2019}}</ref>