Inconsequential television week
- Publication: The Newcastle Journal
- Date: 1989-09-09
- Author:
- Page: 11
- Language: English
Well, Dr Who, BBC1, is given that appellation, and certainly the current adventure, which will last four weeks, has not been dredged up from the archives.
Yet the formula is relentlessly the same as when, in gentler days, the programme descended upon us at Saturday teatime, and children hid behind sofas, cushions-anything—as the Daleks approached.
Now, Dr Who suddently respectable is given adult scheduling directly opposite Coronation Street.
Why does this happen? The only explanation can be that Dr Who nowadays is only fit for ingenuous grown-ups. Today's small children, presumably, would hoot it off the screen.
Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org
- APA 6th ed.: (1989-09-09). Inconsequential television week. The Newcastle Journal p. 11.
- MLA 7th ed.: "Inconsequential television week." The Newcastle Journal [add city] 1989-09-09, 11. Print.
- Chicago 15th ed.: "Inconsequential television week." The Newcastle Journal, edition, sec., 1989-09-09
- Turabian: "Inconsequential television week." The Newcastle Journal, 1989-09-09, section, 11 edition.
- Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=Inconsequential television week | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Inconsequential_television_week | work=The Newcastle Journal | pages=11 | date=1989-09-09 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=25 November 2024 }}</ref>
- Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=Inconsequential television week | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Inconsequential_television_week | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=25 November 2024}}</ref>
