Timelord triumphs in our age of irony
- Publication: The Observer
- Date: 2005-03-27
- Author: Kathryn Flett
- Page: 13
- Language: English
At 13 Robin McKie saw the first episode of Doctor Who. As the Tardis returned to TV last night, he watched with his daughter, Olivia, 9, to see if the Doctor can inspire a new generation of fans
I'D LIKE to claim I spent my youthful Saturday evenings huddled in terror behind the family sofa as ghastly monsters pursued Doctor Who and his plucky girl assistants. Sadly I was already a hardened teenager of 13 and therefore too old when the first black-and-white episode was shown. I was captivated nevertheless and was one of the gabbling proselytisers who helped create the show's worth-of-mouth popularity.
Four decades later, I cannot now remember why Doctor Who held me in its thrall for the next 10 years. It was fun and imaginative, I suppose, and of course we lads could goggle Leela, Vicki, Zoe, Jo and all the other Doctor Who 'ladies'. But science fiction is now mainstream entertainment. Stargate, Millennium, and The X-Files have extremely high production values. You can't get away with polystyrene monsters trundling through old quarries any more. Bringing back the old boy was therefore a courageous move. I'm pleased to say it was also an inspired one, a triumph of tight writing, wit, good editing and some smashing acting. Watching with my nine-year-old daughter Olivia added an extra pleasure.
Things have changed since 1963 when everyone in Doctor Who was Home Counties and white. The Doctor (William Hartnell) was a grumpy old man, with a mimsy obedient grand-daughter whose strange antics attract the attention of two very proper teachers from her school. They pay a visit and end up being whisked through time and space. Next stop the Stone Age and then the Daleks. Served them right, too.
In 2005 all that remains of the old Doctor is his police box (strangely unadorned by graffiti), the weird whooshing noise it makes when heading into hyperspace, and the theme music. The Doctor (Christopher Eccleston) is now a craggily good-looking bit of trouser with a fine line in leather jackets and a pronounced northern accent. ('Lots of planets have a north,' he snarls to a complaint about his speech.) His assistant Rose (Billie Piper) lives on a housing estate, has flunked her A-levels, is stuck with a dodgy, compensation-seeking mum, possesses a fine estuary accent and has a black boyfriend. The fact that the latter is subsequently eaten by a wheelie-bin - only to survive and then be dumped by Rose - merely adds spice to the proceedings.
However, it's not the contemporary values that make the show. It is its clever imitation of US hits such as Buffy and Angel: a mixture of smart, ironic humour and creepy horror. 'That won't last,' says the Doctor, peering at a couple posing for the pages of Heat. 'He's gay and she's an alien.' And Rose has some equally sassy gags. Told that an Evil Intelligence is going to bring all the world's plastic to life, she gasps: 'What, even breast implants?'
Thus the adult half of the audience is - on the evidence of the first episode - well-catered for. It remains to be seen what younger, thrill-seeking TV-watchers will make of it. Last night's episode was primarily concerned with establishing character and had few special effects. Trailers suggest some fairly strong production values for future Saturdays, so I would have thought the BBC - thanks mainly to producer Russell T. Davies who also penned last night's episode is on to a winner. I for one will be watching.
The Young Viewer's Verdict
Not scary ... but funny
by Olivia McKie, aged nine
BECAUSE of what I'd heard, I thought this programme was going to be a lot more frightening; in fact, although it was exciting, it wasn't particularly scary. What I didn't expect was that Doctor Who was quite funny. The story was good and I liked Rose was brave and quick-thinking.
There are more scary programmes on television - or were - for example Buffy the Vampire Slayer. In its earlier seasons it was gruesome and throughout the whole show Buffy was very jumpy.
In Doctor Who, there weren't many special effects in this episode but by watching the trailer you can see that a lot more will be used in future episodes. What I found funny about the Doctor is that in very worrying parts he will make a joke.
I felt sorry for Rose's boyfriend at the end of the episode. He seemed so upset when Rose left to be with the Doctor. I felt Rose and the Doctor were equally good, although in different ways, and I will definitely watch Doctor Who again.
Caption: Robin and Olivia McKie watch last night's opening episode
Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org
- APA 6th ed.: Flett, Kathryn (2005-03-27). Timelord triumphs in our age of irony. The Observer p. 13.
- MLA 7th ed.: Flett, Kathryn. "Timelord triumphs in our age of irony." The Observer [add city] 2005-03-27, 13. Print.
- Chicago 15th ed.: Flett, Kathryn. "Timelord triumphs in our age of irony." The Observer, edition, sec., 2005-03-27
- Turabian: Flett, Kathryn. "Timelord triumphs in our age of irony." The Observer, 2005-03-27, section, 13 edition.
- Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=Timelord triumphs in our age of irony | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Timelord_triumphs_in_our_age_of_irony | work=The Observer | pages=13 | date=2005-03-27 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=15 April 2025 }}</ref>
- Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=Timelord triumphs in our age of irony | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Timelord_triumphs_in_our_age_of_irony | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=15 April 2025}}</ref>
