<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=South_on_Saturday</id>
	<title>South on Saturday - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=South_on_Saturday"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php?title=South_on_Saturday&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-11T04:06:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.33.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php?title=South_on_Saturday&amp;diff=15732&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>John Lavalie: Created page with &quot;{{article | publication = Cambridge Evening News | file = 1984-06-03 Cambridge Evening News.jpg | px = 450 | height =  | width =  | date = 1984-06-03 | author =  | pages =  |...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php?title=South_on_Saturday&amp;diff=15732&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2016-10-15T23:12:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{article | publication = Cambridge Evening News | file = 1984-06-03 Cambridge Evening News.jpg | px = 450 | height =  | width =  | date = 1984-06-03 | author =  | pages =  |...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{article&lt;br /&gt;
| publication = Cambridge Evening News&lt;br /&gt;
| file = 1984-06-03 Cambridge Evening News.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| px = 450&lt;br /&gt;
| height = &lt;br /&gt;
| width = &lt;br /&gt;
| date = 1984-06-03&lt;br /&gt;
| author = &lt;br /&gt;
| pages = &lt;br /&gt;
| language = English &lt;br /&gt;
| type = &lt;br /&gt;
| description = &lt;br /&gt;
| categories = &lt;br /&gt;
| moreTitles = &lt;br /&gt;
| morePublications = &lt;br /&gt;
| moreDates = &lt;br /&gt;
| text = &lt;br /&gt;
SOUTH ON SATURDAY	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These rather gloomy reflections are partly inspired by the delightful chat I had with Jon Pertwee in Cambridge the other day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we talked it became clear to me how much this marvellous man hoe been there almost all my life. making me laugh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His memoirs, &amp;quot;Moon Boots and Dinner Suits,&amp;quot; to be published by Hamish Hamilton in October, will make the point even more clearly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who remembers his mad postman in &amp;quot;Waterlogged Spa,' cackling insanely &amp;quot;What does it matter what you do as long as you tear 'em up?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His chief petty officer in &amp;quot;The Navy Lark&amp;quot; was wonderfully funny. So was his CPO's wicked uncle. And as for his absentminded admiral, there was a comic creation of true originality end joy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The admiral was based on a real person I knew,' Pertwee told me. &amp;quot;He used to speak even his most embarassing thoughts aloud, not realising he was doing it. All I did In creating the admiral wee to caricature a real person.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For television Pertwee ha. tackled Dr. Who in a workmanlike and diligent fashion, but it took the role of Wurzel Gummidge to exploit his genius for the small screen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He developed the character beyond the author's original inspiration, showing us the full mischief of naievety. There is, I fancy, something of the atavistic Green Man about Pertwee's Gummidge. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yet this rare example of a comedian being fully exploited on television was too good to last.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He sighed to tell me how he had tried and tried in vain to get a new series made by any television company, yet the earlier series sold handsomely ell over the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It makes we sick to think of how those of us trying to get Wurzel back on the screen have been frustrated sometimes by excuses that were plainly fine,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I asked why he and other. of our great comic. did not do more for the cheaper and sometimes better medium of radio. &amp;quot;Money,' was the simple answer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Television allows performers to command such irresistibly high fees and radio is so poor that it Is now almost impossible to do anything but broadcast repeats from better days.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yet radio has huge advantages for a comic, just think how Pertwee played up to three parts simultaneously in &amp;quot;Navy Lark.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And think how much better Tony Hancock's radio shows were than his television attempts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I fear television, the cinema and radio are now falling to capture adequately the great gifts of these many men God sent to make us laugh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caption: Jon Pertwee — delightful chat&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>John Lavalie</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>