<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_script_was_quite_simply_no_good</id>
	<title>The script was quite simply no good - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_script_was_quite_simply_no_good"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php?title=The_script_was_quite_simply_no_good&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-29T13:18:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.33.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php?title=The_script_was_quite_simply_no_good&amp;diff=30500&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>John Lavalie: Created page with &quot;{{article | publication = London Evening Standard | file = 1993-07-14 Evening Standard.jpg | px = 450 | height =  | width =  | date = 1993-07-14 | author = Nicholas Hellen  |...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php?title=The_script_was_quite_simply_no_good&amp;diff=30500&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2022-01-20T00:46:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{article | publication = London Evening Standard | file = 1993-07-14 Evening Standard.jpg | px = 450 | height =  | width =  | date = 1993-07-14 | author = Nicholas Hellen  |...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{article&lt;br /&gt;
| publication = London Evening Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| file = 1993-07-14 Evening Standard.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| px = 450&lt;br /&gt;
| height = &lt;br /&gt;
| width = &lt;br /&gt;
| date = 1993-07-14&lt;br /&gt;
| author = Nicholas Hellen &lt;br /&gt;
| pages = 32&lt;br /&gt;
| language = English &lt;br /&gt;
| type = &lt;br /&gt;
| description = &lt;br /&gt;
| categories = &lt;br /&gt;
| moreTitles = &lt;br /&gt;
| morePublications = &lt;br /&gt;
| moreDates = &lt;br /&gt;
| text = &lt;br /&gt;
IT SHOULD have been the perfect opportunity to display the BBC Drama Department's fresh willingness to give the public what they want.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the ignominious collapse last Friday of plans to screen a 30th-anniversary special of Dr Who has infuriated the show's thousands of fans and made the return of the Time Lord appear more remote than ever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disregarding a three-line whip against discussing the fiasco, my BBC source tells me that the project ran aground on an unusually ill-tempered power struggle between rival departments. Dr Who has never been a favourite of the Drama Department. Indeed, one school of thought has it that the show was axed just to spite its obsessive fans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But scrapping production three weeks into development has ended up irritating everybody. Garry Russell, editor of the Dr Who fanzine, tells me of hopes dashed and money wasted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actor Colin Baker, one of the more recent Doctors, is more dismissive: &amp;quot;The script was quite simply no good,&amp;quot; he tells me. &amp;quot;It is sad that it went so far and yet failed to work out.&amp;quot; In time-honoured Corporation fashion, he was still waiting to be told of the show's cancellation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spelling correction: Gary Russell &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>John Lavalie</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>