Difference between revisions of "The year of the Doctor"
From The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Jump to navigationJump to searchJohn Lavalie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{article | publication = Science Fiction Film and Television | file = | px = | height = | width = | date = 2014-07-01 | display date = Vol. 7, no. 2 (July 2014) | author = |...") |
John Lavalie (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| date = 2014-07-01 | | date = 2014-07-01 | ||
| display date = Vol. 7, no. 2 (July 2014) | | display date = Vol. 7, no. 2 (July 2014) | ||
| − | | author = | + | | author = Matt Hills |
| − | | pages = | + | | pages = 159-178 |
| language = English | | language = English | ||
| type = | | type = | ||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 18 August 2015
No image available.
[edit]
- Publication: Science Fiction Film and Television
- Date: Vol. 7, no. 2 (July 2014)
- Author: Matt Hills
- Page: 159-178
- Language: English
- Abstract: This article considers how Doctor Who's, 50th anniversary was strategically utilised by the BBC. Framed within a neoliberal consunner-cultural context, the programme was extensively merchandised and commodified by BBC Worldwide, with profits going back into BBC public service programming. But at the same time as commercial exploitation threatened to encroach on the BBC's identity as a public service broadcaster - especially via events such as the ExCeL 'Celebration' - Who's commemoration was positioned as a matter of public value, providing the 'social glue' to unite a nation, if not a global array of fan-viewers, whilst drawing on 'BBC nostalgia' (Holdsworth 113). By analysing tensions between commercialism and public service broadcasting, I argue that the contemporary BBC displays a doubled attention to public service television, seeking discursively to separate public value from exchange value (via binaries such as UK-global or past-present), and yet also to legitimate commercial activity as a necessary supplement to licence-fee funding. Doctor Who's 50th, conceptualised and marketed as a 'media event', enabled the BBC performatively to align itself with historical value and social unification, but it also unevenly blurred together commercial and public value in a range of ways that were typically left uncontested by neoliberal 'common sense'.
Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org
- APA 6th ed.: Hills, Matt (Vol. 7, no. 2 (July 2014)). The year of the Doctor. Science Fiction Film and Television p. 159-178.
- MLA 7th ed.: Hills, Matt. "The year of the Doctor." Science Fiction Film and Television [add city] Vol. 7, no. 2 (July 2014), 159-178. Print.
- Chicago 15th ed.: Hills, Matt. "The year of the Doctor." Science Fiction Film and Television, edition, sec., Vol. 7, no. 2 (July 2014)
- Turabian: Hills, Matt. "The year of the Doctor." Science Fiction Film and Television, Vol. 7, no. 2 (July 2014), section, 159-178 edition.
- Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=The year of the Doctor | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/The_year_of_the_Doctor | work=Science Fiction Film and Television | pages=159-178 | date=Vol. 7, no. 2 (July 2014) | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=22 November 2024 }}</ref>
- Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=The year of the Doctor | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/The_year_of_the_Doctor | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=22 November 2024}}</ref>
