Difference between revisions of "Reader Rant"
From The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Jump to navigationJump to searchJohn Lavalie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{article | publication = Daily Mirror | file = 2005-04-30 Daily Mirror.jpg | px = 450 | height = | width = | date = 2005-04-30 | author = | pages = | language = English...") |
John Lavalie (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{article | {{article | ||
| − | | publication = | + | | publication = The Mirror |
| file = 2005-04-30 Daily Mirror.jpg | | file = 2005-04-30 Daily Mirror.jpg | ||
| px = 450 | | px = 450 | ||
Latest revision as of 01:48, 3 July 2016
[edit]
- Publication: The Mirror
- Date: 2005-04-30
- Author:
- Page:
- Language: English
Dear We Love Telly! The new Doctor Who (right) is trendy, infantile and utterly vacuous. Russell T Davies' obsession with passing wind is a disgrace to the memory of 26 years of family entertainment.
Jon Ericsson
Doncaster, S Yorks (by email)
Additional keyword: Rose
Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org
- APA 6th ed.: (2005-04-30). Reader Rant. The Mirror .
- MLA 7th ed.: "Reader Rant." The Mirror [add city] 2005-04-30. Print.
- Chicago 15th ed.: "Reader Rant." The Mirror, edition, sec., 2005-04-30
- Turabian: "Reader Rant." The Mirror, 2005-04-30, section, edition.
- Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=Reader Rant | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Reader_Rant | work=The Mirror | pages= | date=2005-04-30 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=22 November 2024 }}</ref>
- Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=Reader Rant | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Reader_Rant | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=22 November 2024}}</ref>
