Doctor Who Cuttings Archive

Reader Rant

From The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Revision as of 01:48, 3 July 2016 by John Lavalie (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

2005-04-30 Daily Mirror.jpg

[edit]

Dear We Love Telly! The new Doctor Who (right) is trendy, infantile and utterly vacuous. Russell T Davies' obsession with passing wind is a disgrace to the memory of 26 years of family entertainment.

Jon Ericsson

Doncaster, S Yorks (by email)


Additional keyword: Rose

Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org

  • APA 6th ed.: (2005-04-30). Reader Rant. The Mirror .
  • MLA 7th ed.: "Reader Rant." The Mirror [add city] 2005-04-30. Print.
  • Chicago 15th ed.: "Reader Rant." The Mirror, edition, sec., 2005-04-30
  • Turabian: "Reader Rant." The Mirror, 2005-04-30, section, edition.
  • Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=Reader Rant | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Reader_Rant | work=The Mirror | pages= | date=2005-04-30 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=22 November 2024 }}</ref>
  • Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=Reader Rant | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Reader_Rant | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=22 November 2024}}</ref>