Difference between revisions of "Consultants anonymous"
John Lavalie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{article | publication = The Observer | file = 1965-06-27 Observer.jpg | px = 450 | height = | width = | date = 1965-06-27 | author = Maurice Richardson | pages = 20 | langua...") |
John Lavalie (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| moreDates = | | moreDates = | ||
| text = | | text = | ||
| − | I've no wish to see that [[ | + | I've no wish to see that [[Special:BrowseData/Peter Cushing|Dalek film]]. For me there can be only one Dr Who. William Hartnell's rendering of the fusty, crusty, snuffy-trousered, old succubus with that disconcerting air of equivocation which becomes extremely sinister at times (no wonder it was so difficult to tell which was the real Who and which the anti-Who robot) is superb. He rounds out the character beautifully. |
His begetters were Absolutely right to give him that Edwardian ambience, as if his clock had stopped before 1914. This helps to establish the timeless continuum of the traditional comic-cuts world of children's science fiction. It links Who with archetypes such as Professor Radium and wins him a huge extra age-group of fans, us pre-seniles who wouldn't want to know him if he looked streamlined and with it, like the new-style American puppets. | His begetters were Absolutely right to give him that Edwardian ambience, as if his clock had stopped before 1914. This helps to establish the timeless continuum of the traditional comic-cuts world of children's science fiction. It links Who with archetypes such as Professor Radium and wins him a huge extra age-group of fans, us pre-seniles who wouldn't want to know him if he looked streamlined and with it, like the new-style American puppets. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 03:00, 19 December 2013
- Publication: The Observer
- Date: 1965-06-27
- Author: Maurice Richardson
- Page: 20
- Language: English
I've no wish to see that Dalek film. For me there can be only one Dr Who. William Hartnell's rendering of the fusty, crusty, snuffy-trousered, old succubus with that disconcerting air of equivocation which becomes extremely sinister at times (no wonder it was so difficult to tell which was the real Who and which the anti-Who robot) is superb. He rounds out the character beautifully.
His begetters were Absolutely right to give him that Edwardian ambience, as if his clock had stopped before 1914. This helps to establish the timeless continuum of the traditional comic-cuts world of children's science fiction. It links Who with archetypes such as Professor Radium and wins him a huge extra age-group of fans, us pre-seniles who wouldn't want to know him if he looked streamlined and with it, like the new-style American puppets.
Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org
- APA 6th ed.: Richardson, Maurice (1965-06-27). Consultants anonymous. The Observer p. 20.
- MLA 7th ed.: Richardson, Maurice. "Consultants anonymous." The Observer [add city] 1965-06-27, 20. Print.
- Chicago 15th ed.: Richardson, Maurice. "Consultants anonymous." The Observer, edition, sec., 1965-06-27
- Turabian: Richardson, Maurice. "Consultants anonymous." The Observer, 1965-06-27, section, 20 edition.
- Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=Consultants anonymous | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Consultants_anonymous | work=The Observer | pages=20 | date=1965-06-27 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=19 April 2024 }}</ref>
- Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=Consultants anonymous | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Consultants_anonymous | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=19 April 2024}}</ref>
