Doctor Who Cuttings Archive

The monsters in Doctor Who were much less complex

From The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Revision as of 11:31, 21 January 2021 by John Lavalie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{article | publication = The Sunday Times | file = 2020-01-05 Sunday Times.jpg | px = 450 | height = | width = | date = 2020-01-05 | author = Victoria Segal | pages = Cultu...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

2020-01-05 Sunday Times.jpg

[edit]

The monsters in Doctor Who were much less complex: glowing energy beasts bumping off international intelligence agents and reconfiguring their DNA. In a gluttonous attempt to court multiple fandoms, Spyfall was a smart James Bond pastiche, with Jodie Whittaker's excellent Doctor and her crew drafted in by MI6's boss, C (Stephen Fry), to help save the planet. A box of gadgets, motorbike chases, aeroplane stunts, immaculate arch villain Lenny Henry: it was hardly true to the Whovian spirit, but it lightened up Chris Chibnall's heavy message about sinister tech companies with more power than nations.

Fry's comment on being introduced to the Doctor for the first time was funny and astute — "Don't be ridiculous, I've seen the files, the Doctor's a man," he harrumphed — but there were moments when it all felt a little too meme-ready, a GIF in waiting. Yet as the true nature of helpful nerd 0 (Sacha Dhawan) suddenly became horribly clear, you could feel the show's core storytelling values tighten irresistibly, and, once again, the Doctor was at the centre of her universe.

Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org

  • APA 6th ed.: Segal, Victoria (2020-01-05). The monsters in Doctor Who were much less complex. The Sunday Times p. Culture, p. 10.
  • MLA 7th ed.: Segal, Victoria. "The monsters in Doctor Who were much less complex." The Sunday Times [add city] 2020-01-05, Culture, p. 10. Print.
  • Chicago 15th ed.: Segal, Victoria. "The monsters in Doctor Who were much less complex." The Sunday Times, edition, sec., 2020-01-05
  • Turabian: Segal, Victoria. "The monsters in Doctor Who were much less complex." The Sunday Times, 2020-01-05, section, Culture, p. 10 edition.
  • Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=The monsters in Doctor Who were much less complex | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/The_monsters_in_Doctor_Who_were_much_less_complex | work=The Sunday Times | pages=Culture, p. 10 | date=2020-01-05 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=18 April 2024 }}</ref>
  • Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=The monsters in Doctor Who were much less complex | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/The_monsters_in_Doctor_Who_were_much_less_complex | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=18 April 2024}}</ref>