Who is not tied-up
From The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Revision as of 15:26, 28 August 2016 by John Lavalie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{article | publication = The Times | file = 2010-03-29 Times.jpg | px = 450 | height = | width = | date = 2010-03-29 | author = | pages = 21 | language = English | type =...")
[edit]
- Publication: The Times
- Date: 2010-03-29
- Author:
- Page: 21
- Language: English
Sir, One hopes that the new Doctor Who's laudible choice of industry-saving Harris tweed (report, Mar 27) could be concurrent with a campaign to promote the proper tying of a bow tie, thus ridding us of the cheap, poorly fitting, ready-made contraption with which he adorned Saturday's front page.
ADRIAN PEACOCK
Holbrook, Suffolk
Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org
- APA 6th ed.: (2010-03-29). Who is not tied-up. The Times p. 21.
- MLA 7th ed.: "Who is not tied-up." The Times [add city] 2010-03-29, 21. Print.
- Chicago 15th ed.: "Who is not tied-up." The Times, edition, sec., 2010-03-29
- Turabian: "Who is not tied-up." The Times, 2010-03-29, section, 21 edition.
- Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=Who is not tied-up | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Who_is_not_tied-up | work=The Times | pages=21 | date=2010-03-29 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=23 April 2024 }}</ref>
- Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=Who is not tied-up | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Who_is_not_tied-up | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=23 April 2024}}</ref>
