Doctor Who Cuttings Archive

Why (Not) a Woman?

From The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Revision as of 00:34, 9 February 2019 by John Lavalie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{article | publication = Radio Times | file = 2017-08-05 Radio Times p150.jpg | px = 450 | height = | width = | date = 2017-08-05 | author = | pages = 150 | language = Eng...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

2017-08-05 Radio Times p150.jpg

[edit]

As a long-term viewer of Doctor Who, I am still not sure if the casting of a woman as the Doctor is not a joke. It is no reflection on Jodie Whittaker, who was excellent in Broadchurch. And women make great science-fiction heroes, from Bully Summers in Buffy the Vampire Slayer to Kathryn Janeway in Star Trek: Voyager.

But these are original characters. Is it appropriate, or likely, that any of them would undergo a gender shift? I hope that I will be proved wrong, and that the female Doctor will somehow be a success.

David Tallach Inverness

... I was disappointed to read that the majority of comments RT received regarding the casting of the 13th Doctor were negative. Sadly, people who are angry are more inclined to comment.

Everyone I know who likes Doctor Who is positive about the casting.

I find it odd that a show so much about change has some fans who seem to have difficulty with it. Like the "too young" gripes before Matt Smith's first season, I expect that, for most people, as soon as we see Jodie in the role she will be not the first female Doctor, just the new Doctor.

Ian Reed Willenhall, West Midlands

...I can't believe the fuss over the casting of the new Doctor as a woman. Why should it warrant so much as a raised eyebrow? As long ago as 1928, in her novel Orlando, Virginia Woolf created a hero who is inexplicably transformed from man to woman - and lives on without visibly ageing for another 300 years (the first Time Lord?).

Christine Shuttleworth London W12

Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org

  • APA 6th ed.: (2017-08-05). Why (Not) a Woman?. Radio Times p. 150.
  • MLA 7th ed.: "Why (Not) a Woman?." Radio Times [add city] 2017-08-05, 150. Print.
  • Chicago 15th ed.: "Why (Not) a Woman?." Radio Times, edition, sec., 2017-08-05
  • Turabian: "Why (Not) a Woman?." Radio Times, 2017-08-05, section, 150 edition.
  • Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=Why (Not) a Woman? | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Why_(Not)_a_Woman%3F | work=Radio Times | pages=150 | date=2017-08-05 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=16 April 2024 }}</ref>
  • Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=Why (Not) a Woman? | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Why_(Not)_a_Woman%3F | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=16 April 2024}}</ref>


Retrieved from "http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php?title=Why_(Not)_a_Woman%3F&oldid=21852"