Doctor Who Cuttings Archive

Difference between revisions of "The Doctor is an Actor"

From The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "{{Starlog|077}}{{article | publication = Starlog | file = | px = | height = | width = | date = 1983-11-08 | author = Patrick Daniel O'Neill | pages = 23 | language = Engli...")
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
Now, three years after Baker "died" in the last episode of "[[broadwcast:Logopolis|Logopolis]]" (to be replaced by Peter Davison), he remembers his TV tenure as "very, very happy years — I don't recall a single day when I didn't want to go to work."  
 
Now, three years after Baker "died" in the last episode of "[[broadwcast:Logopolis|Logopolis]]" (to be replaced by Peter Davison), he remembers his TV tenure as "very, very happy years — I don't recall a single day when I didn't want to go to work."  
  
Working on Who could be quite strenuous; it usually took about 48 weeks to tape a single season's 26 episodes. Nevertheless, Baker says it was worth it: "I ran ember laughing a lot, enjoying the energy, and being the weekly reference point with new directors and new designers. It's a sort of involvement which will probably never occur for me again, because I can't imagine doing a TV series where I would stay for so long." He pauses to reflect. "I think I probably stayed too long on Doctor Who. I should have been brave and given someone else a chance earlier, but it's quite hard to up something which makes you very happy.  
+
Working on Who could be quite strenuous; it usually took about 48 weeks to tape a single season's 26 episodes. Nevertheless, Baker says it was worth it: "I remember laughing a lot, enjoying the energy, and being the weekly reference point with new directors and new designers. It's a sort of involvement which will probably never occur for me again, because I can't imagine doing a TV series where I would stay for so long." He pauses to reflect. "I think I probably stayed too long on Doctor Who. I should have been brave and given someone else a chance earlier, but it's quite hard to up something which makes you very happy.  
  
 
'There's a dilemma which actors face. As soon as you're successful in something, there's a temptation to think, 'Well, let's move on and capitalize on it,' since variety is at stretches an actor. In the end, I believe saved because they took the time to consider my views and listen to them. They were enough to do that because they were convinced that I had the program's total interest at heart."  
 
'There's a dilemma which actors face. As soon as you're successful in something, there's a temptation to think, 'Well, let's move on and capitalize on it,' since variety is at stretches an actor. In the end, I believe saved because they took the time to consider my views and listen to them. They were enough to do that because they were convinced that I had the program's total interest at heart."  

Revision as of 22:44, 18 September 2014

Template:StarlogNo image available. However there is a transcription available.

Do you have an image? Email us: whovian@cuttingsarchive.org


[edit]
  • Publication: Starlog
  • Date: 1983-11-08
  • Author: Patrick Daniel O'Neill
  • Page: 23
  • Language: English

An ex-Time Lord remembers the terror and the sweetness of acting up as the star of Doctor Who


The Filmgoer's Companion describes him as a "British character actor with a larger-than-life air," and for seven years, Tom Baker brought that very quality to the title role of the longest-running science-fiction TV series ever, Britain's Doctor Who.

Now, three years after Baker "died" in the last episode of "Logopolis" (to be replaced by Peter Davison), he remembers his TV tenure as "very, very happy years — I don't recall a single day when I didn't want to go to work."

Working on Who could be quite strenuous; it usually took about 48 weeks to tape a single season's 26 episodes. Nevertheless, Baker says it was worth it: "I remember laughing a lot, enjoying the energy, and being the weekly reference point with new directors and new designers. It's a sort of involvement which will probably never occur for me again, because I can't imagine doing a TV series where I would stay for so long." He pauses to reflect. "I think I probably stayed too long on Doctor Who. I should have been brave and given someone else a chance earlier, but it's quite hard to up something which makes you very happy.

'There's a dilemma which actors face. As soon as you're successful in something, there's a temptation to think, 'Well, let's move on and capitalize on it,' since variety is at stretches an actor. In the end, I believe saved because they took the time to consider my views and listen to them. They were enough to do that because they were convinced that I had the program's total interest at heart."

Given such happy memories, why isn't Baker appearing in the BBC's 20th anniversary celebration of Doctor Who's first broadcast? At the time of taping, Baker was touring with the Royal Shakespeare Company, despite attempts to shoot around that commitment by producer John Nathan-Turner, the actor decided not to appear in the show. "I did look at the script and think about it for a week or two," Baker says, "but, somehow, I couldn't brave — I didn't have the will power to go back to something which I had left, that I had been so happy in, and return to it with strangers. I just couldn't accept that feeling — and John Nathan-Turner was very sympathetic. He said he half-understood, which I thought was very kind." Nevertheless, Baker's presence will be felt in the anniversary special through footage from the previously un-aired story "Shada," which was halted in production by a 1980 technicians' strike and never completed.

Baker joined the BBC's long-running science-fantasy series in 1974 in the final scenes of "Planet of the Spiders," replacing Jon Pertwee as the renegade Time Lord. Before donning his characteristic floppy hat and trailing scarf, Baker enjoyed an impressive career as a character actor on screen and the British stage. His film roles include Rasputin in 1971's Nicholas and Alexandra, a segment of the 1973 EC Comics homage, Vault of Horror, and the villain in 1974's Golden Voyage of Sinbad.

During his stint as The Doctor (he played the role longer than any other actor), Baker appeared in 41 Who stories, and co-starred with eight traveling companions: Elisabeth Sladen (Sara Jane Smith), Ian Marter (Lt. Harry Sullivan), Louise Jameson (Leela), Mary Tamm and Lalla Ward (Romanas I and II), Matthew Waterhouse (Adriatic), Janet Fielding (Tegan Jovanka) and Sarah Sutton (Nyssa).

Since leaving the TARDIS in 1980, Baker has been busy. In addition to his Royal Shakespeare performances, he played the title role in The Trials of Oscar Wilde in London's West End theater district and later Long John Silver in a stage version of Treasure Island. Offered the chance to portray Salieri in Amadeus in a British tour, Baker turned it down due to the nine-month commitment. Usually, an actor leaving a role like The Doctor would be deluged with scripts to repeat the character under another name in a similar series, but Baker has been lucky. "The anxiety of being typecast has largely vanished for me," he comments.

Baker is married to a Who co-star, actress Lalla Ward, who played Romana from 1980-81. After departing the series, Ward toured in a play directed by Gillian (Cats) Lynn and co-starring Leslie Caron.

Inside Who's soul

His most famous role, Baker admits, is not a part which allows an actor to experiment. "The Doctor," he says, "wasn't really an acting part, in that it never really could develop. This character was utterly predictable—being the hero, he always comes out on the moral side. Everyone in the audience knows all about him: his home planet, his age. They know that he is an innocent, that he doesn't get overly involved emotionally with people, and that he moves around in this wonderful machine which is dimensionally transcendental, bigger on the inside than the outside.

"Everybody knew all these facts, and nothing could change. One of television's paradoxes is that it takes place almost exclusively in a domestic context. Any long-running series freezes characters once they have become established, because the audience doesn't like sudden changes. If someone wrote a Doctor Who story in which he got involved with a girl, or was gratuitously violent, I think that would be unbearable for our audience. That predictability, that certainty, of a character's qualities reassures the audience— and they don 't want it changed, just like a small child wouldn't like his favorite uncle showing up after two months sprouting a beard— or totally bald.

"The problem is how to be inventive within those very severe, daunting limitations. I enjoyed the challenge of trying to be surprising and inventive within those boundaries. To a certain extent, I met that challenge by going out to promote the show and meeting the children who watched it. I was always very touched by the sweetness of their response. I was touched most of all that, just for a little while in my life— you know the expression, 'Don't talk to strangers'?— that rule didn't apply to me. I had, through the license of television and the character I was playing, a marvelous, intricate intimacy with children. That was very precious to me."

Baker says he has always considered Doctor Who a children's show, "of whatever age," he adds. "Doctor Who is a show meant for people with the childlike ability to respond to the preposterous adventures of innocent with the capacity to be surprised.

In a way, it's easy to play him, because he's an alien, isn't he? And when you're playing an alien, you're licensed to react in quite different ways. You're allowed to be quite mischievous and utterly unpredictable — because your scale of values and experiences, is quite different in the mind of the audience. Therefore, you can threaten someone with a jelly baby rather than a gun, and it makes perfect sense to the audience. "I used to get a bit wound up about the way we seemed to solve everything with an explosion, but that's one of the problems with science fantasy. We tried to do the 'moral' thing, in which the evil forces, after being convinced of the error of their ways, cause their own destruction. Sometimes, we had dilemmas over that, over who was to push the button— but apart from that, Doctor Who was really quite fun."

Baker's long tenure as the British SF hero wasn't his first brush with the world of fantasy. In 1974, he joined John Philip Law, Caroline Munro and stop-motion legend Ray Harryhausen for The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (FANGORIA #4). As villainous Prince Khoura, he opposes Sinbad (Law) in the quest for the pieces of a magic amulet, meeting centaurs, green men, and eight-armed, eight-sworded living statues along the way. His approaches to the evil of Khoura is no different from the heroics of Who. "I don't make a separation between villains and heroes when a part is offered to me," he notes. "When an actor gets hold of a role like Khoura, unless he's an absolute bonehead, he must never categorize the character— because that characterization leads to prejudice and preconceptions. And it's preconceptions in the approach to acting problems which freeze people and prevent spontaneity.

"What I'm saying is that if I was asked to play Dracula, for example, it would never occur to me, once I started working on the role, that he was the villain of the piece. I would only play Dracula from Dracula's point-of-view. It must be left to others, the audience or his opponents in the play, to describe him as the villain. So, it's not actually a question of playing heroes or villains, it's simply a question of playing the best part as well as I possibly can, from that character's point-of-view, and not from the preconceptions of unthinking directors, other actors or critics."

Outside who's world

Since most of his post-Who work has been stage, Tom Baker obviously loves the theater. "There's nothing to compare with that marvelous sense of danger and excitement of doing it live," he notes. "Only having one stab at each scene as you go through it— that, in itself, is marvelously exhilarating. And from the point-of-view of vanity (and you mustn't overlook that), it's a very thrilling experience at the end of a day's work to be applauded very warmly, or to receive an ovation." He contemplates the feeling for a moment and continues. "If there were more ovations in everyday people's lives, they would probably have a happier time. It would be quite interesting, domestically, if after cooking a great dinner for her family, a woman got a standing ovation from them— so that she had to retreat to the kitchen in tears, with all of them shouting 'More, more!' Imagine a similar response when the man comes home with the wage packet, or a child with a good school report.

"Applause is such a sweet, comforting thing and, of course, not very many people get it, do they? Not many people are made to feel important, particularly in an urban society where they are frequently made to feel very lonely, isolated. And that's a tragedy.

"An even bigger difference, in terms of acting styles," Baker says, "is that in television and films, you must scale down the reactions. Additionally, TV and film are very arduous work, because there are so many factors that must come together, over which the actor has no control.

"Essentially, an actor must do every take as if that's the take. I've worked with actors who have assumed there will be say, five takes. I find that very unprofessional and unpardonable. Sometimes, you'll have a take where all the actors get it right, but the fellow pulling focus didn't. So, you do it all again and something else goes wrong. Then, on the third try, an actor blows a line.

"One of the marvelous things about television is that you spend most of your time rehearsing— something most actors like to do. But when it comes to getting it on tape or on film, you must be prepared, although you mustn't assume, that you'll do it again and again and again. If you've prepared it carefully, that repetition can get a bit wearisome."

At the moment, Baker is struggling with an interesting problem for an actor. He is still receiving fan mail for a role he left years ago, and from a new locale, the United States. And the mail itself strikes him as a bit unusual. "Curiously, although I've said I think of the program as a children's series, most American fan mail is from young adults, people in their middle 20s," he notes. "They also seem to read things into the scripts and into my character that quite astonish me. Some fans seem to see something, well, messianic about The Doctor.

"That response may be because American televised SF has always taken itself very seriously, and the acting on those shows— well, the acting isn't really bad, but it's that sort of earnest, I'm-wearing-my-heart-on-my-sleeve' kind of acting. That's one-line, one-thought acting. The kind of character who has always fascinated me is the fiendish type, having lots of thoughts at the same time, combining patience with kindness, fun with anger. I like that complexity of character."

Brushing back his shock of curly hair, Tom Baker sums up American reaction to the Doctor with this anecdote: "I remember meeting one group of American fans and I asked them what I could do for them. As if it had been rehearsed, they all cried out together, 'Take us with you!' I was terribly touched and, at the same time, rather frightened by their reaction. Yet, I'm still very happy to have played The Doctor— and to have touched so many people and been touched, in return, by the sweetness of their smiles."


Captions:

Baker, a master of menace, as the evil magician Prince Khoura, in 1974's The Golden Voyage of Sinbad.

Doctor contemplates destroying his greatest enemies in 1975's "Genesis of the Daleks."

The Doctor and Romana search for the Key to Time in 1978's "The Armageddon Factor."

The Doctor and Sarah in a scene from the 1976 story, "Seeds of Doom."

Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org

  • APA 6th ed.: O'Neill, Patrick Daniel (1983-11-08). The Doctor is an Actor. Starlog p. 23.
  • MLA 7th ed.: O'Neill, Patrick Daniel. "The Doctor is an Actor." Starlog [add city] 1983-11-08, 23. Print.
  • Chicago 15th ed.: O'Neill, Patrick Daniel. "The Doctor is an Actor." Starlog, edition, sec., 1983-11-08
  • Turabian: O'Neill, Patrick Daniel. "The Doctor is an Actor." Starlog, 1983-11-08, section, 23 edition.
  • Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=The Doctor is an Actor | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/The_Doctor_is_an_Actor | work=Starlog | pages=23 | date=1983-11-08 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=21 November 2024 }}</ref>
  • Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=The Doctor is an Actor | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/The_Doctor_is_an_Actor | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=21 November 2024}}</ref>