Blasted by death rays of scepticism
- Publication: The Times
- Date: 2010-04-06
- Author:
- Page: 21
- Language: English
Sir, I read at regular intervals in the paper about the latest "sensational" audience figures, the pre-supposed fascination with an actor to play the role etc, and yet as I remember it, Doctor Who was an averagely interesting show for children. The hype that surrounds it seems to grow, and yet I know of no one that actually watches it.
Am I living on another planet or within a different cosmic time zone, or, as I imagine, being blasted by some invisible death ray of received wisdom concerning its greatness, peddled by a BBC short on ideas but long on tiresome nostalgia?
ANDY SANSOM
London SE22
Disclaimer: These citations are created on-the-fly using primitive parsing techniques. You should double-check all citations. Send feedback to whovian@cuttingsarchive.org
- APA 6th ed.: (2010-04-06). Blasted by death rays of scepticism. The Times p. 21.
- MLA 7th ed.: "Blasted by death rays of scepticism." The Times [add city] 2010-04-06, 21. Print.
- Chicago 15th ed.: "Blasted by death rays of scepticism." The Times, edition, sec., 2010-04-06
- Turabian: "Blasted by death rays of scepticism." The Times, 2010-04-06, section, 21 edition.
- Wikipedia (this article): <ref>{{cite news| title=Blasted by death rays of scepticism | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Blasted_by_death_rays_of_scepticism | work=The Times | pages=21 | date=2010-04-06 | via=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=23 December 2024 }}</ref>
- Wikipedia (this page): <ref>{{cite web | title=Blasted by death rays of scepticism | url=http://cuttingsarchive.org/index.php/Blasted_by_death_rays_of_scepticism | work=Doctor Who Cuttings Archive | accessdate=23 December 2024}}</ref>
